It may be true, as Robertson maintains, that "in the appreciation of medieval art the attitude of the observer is of primary importance . . ." (136).(MLA 187)Les trois points à la fin de la citation signalent que la suite de la phrase a été omise (élision). Si la phrase se terminait à "importance" on aurait :It may be true, as Robertson maintains, that "in the appreciation of medieval art the attitude of the observer is of primary importance" (136).
It may be true that "in the appreciation of medieval art the attitude of the observer is of primary importance . . ." (Robertson 136).
It may be true that "in the appreciation of medieval art the attitude of the observer is of primary importance . . ." (Frye, Anatomy 237).
It may be true that "in the appreciation of medieval art the attitude of the observer is of primary importance . . ." (Sanders: 1997a 32).
Deux auteurs :
... in their sound an meaning" (Jakobson and Waugh 304).
Deux auteurs du même nom :
... in their sound an meaning" (Durant and Durant, Age 214-48).
Plus de deux auteurs :
... else but here" (Rabkin, Greenberg, and Olander vii).